We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Assumptions of IV Methods for Observational Epidemiology

Abstract: Instrumental variable (IV) methods are becoming increasingly popular as they seem to offer the only viable way to overcome the problem of unobserved confounding in observational studies. However, some attention has to be paid to the details, as not all such methods target the same causal parameters and some rely on more restrictive parametric assumptions than others. We therefore discuss and contrast the most common IV approaches with relevance to typical applications in observational epidemiology. Further, we illustrate and compare the asymptotic bias of these IV estimators when underlying assumptions are violated in a numerical study. One of our conclusions is that all IV methods encounter problems in the presence of effect modification by unobserved confounders. Since this can never be ruled out for sure, we recommend that practical applications of IV estimators be accompanied routinely by a sensitivity analysis.
Comments: Published in at this http URL the Statistical Science (this http URL) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (this http URL)
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Journal reference: Statistical Science 2010, Vol. 25, No. 1, 22-40
DOI: 10.1214/09-STS316
Report number: IMS-STS-STS316
Cite as: arXiv:1011.0595 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1011.0595v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Vanessa Didelez [view email]
[v1] Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:23:21 GMT (104kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.