References & Citations
Statistics > Other Statistics
Title: Degrees of Equivalence in a Key Comparison
(Submitted on 6 Dec 2010 (v1), last revised 13 Dec 2011 (this version, v2))
Abstract: In an interlaboratory key comparison, a data analysis procedure for this comparison was proposed and recommended by CIPM [1, 2, 3], therein the degrees of equivalence of measurement standards of the laboratories participated in the comparison and the ones between each two laboratories were introduced but a corresponding clear and plausible measurement model was not given. Authors in [4] offered possible measurement models for a given comparison and a suitable model was selected out after rigorous analyzing steps for expectation values of these degrees of equivalence. The systematic laboratory-effects model was then selected as a right one in this report. Those models were all based on the one true value existence assumption. However in the year 2008, a new version of the Vocabulary for International Metrology (VIM) [7] was issued where the true value of a given measurement standard should be now perceived as multi true values which following a given statistics distribution. Applying this perception of true values of a measurement standard with combination of the steps in [4], measurement models have been developed and degrees of equivalence have been analyzed. The results show that although with new definition, the systematic laboratory-effects model is still the reasonable one in a given key comparison.
Submission history
From: Thang Le mr [view email][v1] Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:30:07 GMT (132kb)
[v2] Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:36:32 GMT (119kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.