References & Citations
Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture
Title: Technical Report : ContikiMAC vs X-MAC performance analysis
(Submitted on 14 Apr 2014 (v1), last revised 6 Apr 2016 (this version, v6))
Abstract: This paper try to better understand the performance of ContikiMAC compared to X-MAC. ContikiMAC achieves a transmission by repeatedly transmitting a data packet until the reception of an ACK from the destination. While X-MAC uses a stream of small size strobes to advertise the destination of the incoming transmission. A priori, X-MAC is then less bandwidth consumptive. To better understand the efficiency of ContikiMAC, despite an intuitively more consumptive transmitting procedure, we have compared this protocol to an updated version of X-MAC which has been designed with the goal to obtain a more objective comparison. At our best knowledge, this kind of "objective" and detailed analysis has never been produced. Both protocols performances are evaluated in terms of number of retransmissions, latency, packet delivery ratio (PDR) and duty-cycle. Our study reveals that the combination of the fast-sleep optimization shortening the wake-up period with a transmission procedure more efficient helps ContikiMAC to obtain a better PDR at the cost of a reduced latency and energy consumption.
Submission history
From: Mathieu Michel [view email][v1] Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:08:13 GMT (1030kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 22 May 2014 14:03:45 GMT (1156kb,D)
[v3] Wed, 1 Oct 2014 06:57:40 GMT (1331kb,D)
[v4] Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:33:55 GMT (1791kb,D)
[v5] Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:02:26 GMT (1472kb,D)
[v6] Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:31:26 GMT (1411kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.