We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

quant-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Quantum Attacks on Classical Proof Systems - The Hardness of Quantum Rewinding

Abstract: Quantum zero-knowledge proofs and quantum proofs of knowledge are inherently difficult to analyze because their security analysis uses rewinding. Certain cases of quantum rewinding are handled by the results by Watrous (SIAM J Comput, 2009) and Unruh (Eurocrypt 2012), yet in general the problem remains elusive. We show that this is not only due to a lack of proof techniques: relative to an oracle, we show that classically secure proofs and proofs of knowledge are insecure in the quantum setting.
More specifically, sigma-protocols, the Fiat-Shamir construction, and Fischlin's proof system are quantum insecure under assumptions that are sufficient for classical security. Additionally, we show that for similar reasons, computationally binding commitments provide almost no security guarantees in a quantum setting.
To show these results, we develop the "pick-one trick", a general technique that allows an adversary to find one value satisfying a given predicate, but not two.
Comments: An extended abstract has appeared at FOCS 2014
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:1404.6898 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1404.6898v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Dominique Unruh [view email]
[v1] Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:41:07 GMT (102kb)
[v2] Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:03:13 GMT (106kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.