Current browse context:
cond-mat.stat-mech
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Condensed Matter > Statistical Mechanics
Title: Comment on "Casimir force in the $O(n\to\infty)$ model with free boundary conditions"
(Submitted on 22 May 2014 (v1), last revised 10 Dec 2014 (this version, v2))
Abstract: In a recent paper [D. Dantchev, J. Bergnoff, and J. Rudnick, Phys. Rev. E 89, 042116 (2014)] the problem of the Casimir force in the $O(n)$ model on a slab with free boundary conditions, investigated earlier by us [EPL 100, 10004 (2012)], is reconsidered using a mean spherical model with separate constraints for each layer. The authors (i) question the applicability of the Ginzburg-Landau-Wilson approach to the low-temperature regime, arguing for the superiority of their model compared to the family of $\phi^4$ models A and B whose numerically exact solutions we determined both for values of the coupling constant $0<g<\infty$ and $g=\infty$. They (ii) report consistency of their results with ours in the critical region and a strong manifestation of universality, but (iii) point out discrepancies with our results in the region below $T_{\mathrm{c}}$. We show here that (i) is unjustified and prove that our model B with $g=\infty$ is identical to their spherical model. Hence evidence for the reported universality is already contained in our work. Moreover, the results we determined for anyone of the models A and B for various thicknesses $L$ are all numerically exact. (iii) is due to their misinterpretation of our results for the scaling limit. We also show that their low-temperature expansion, which does not hold inside the scaling regime, is limited to temperatures lower than they anticipated.
Submission history
From: Alfred Hucht [view email][v1] Thu, 22 May 2014 15:10:44 GMT (81kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:24:01 GMT (88kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.