Current browse context:
quant-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Quantum Physics
Title: Correspondence Principle as Equivalence of Categories
(Submitted on 1 Jun 2015 (v1), last revised 24 Aug 2015 (this version, v2))
Abstract: If quantum mechanics were to be applicable to macroscopic objects, classical mechanics would have to be a limiting case of quantum mechanics. Then the category Set that packages classical mechanics has to be in some sense a 'limiting case' of the category Hilb packaging quantum mechanics. Following from this assumption, quantum-classical correspondence can be considered as a mapping of the category Hilb to the category Set, i.e., a functor from Hilb to Set, taking place in the macroscopic limit. As a procedure, which takes us from an object of the category Hilb (i.e., a Hilbert space) in the macroscopic limit to an object of the category Set (i.e., a set of values that describe the configuration of a system), this functor must take a finite number of steps in order to make the equivalence of Hilb and Set verifiable. However, as it is shown in the present paper, such a constructivist requirement cannot be met in at least one case of an Ising model of a spin glass. This could mean that it is impossible to demonstrate the emergence of classicality totally from the formalism of standard quantum mechanics.
Submission history
From: Arkady Bolotin [view email][v1] Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:28:27 GMT (10kb)
[v2] Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:34:10 GMT (9kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.