Current browse context:
hep-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Title: Where to look for natural supersymmetry
(Submitted on 8 Jun 2015 (v1), last revised 30 Aug 2016 (this version, v3))
Abstract: Why is natural supersymmetry neither detected nor ruled-out to date? To answer this question we use the Bayesian approach where the emphasis on finding prior-independent features within broader and minimally biased frames is taken as the guiding principle. The 20-parameter minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) fits to subjective naturalness indicate the existence of a prior-independent upper bound on the pseudoscalar Higgs boson mass $m_A$ as a function of $\tan \beta$, the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the MSSM Higgs doublets. For a 30-parameter MSSM this implies that $m_A \lesssim 3$ TeV and $\tan \beta \lesssim 25$ at 95\% Bayesian confidence. Removing the contradictory subjectiveness within the electroweak fine-tuning measure leads to finding the naturalness line, $m_A \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \, m_Z \, \tan \beta,$ that reduces by one the number of MSSM Higgs sector free parameters.
Submission history
From: Shehu AbdusSalam [view email][v1] Mon, 8 Jun 2015 13:44:37 GMT (1233kb)
[v2] Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:57:04 GMT (978kb)
[v3] Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:49:35 GMT (978kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.