Title: Event based simulation of an EPR-B experiment by local hidden variables: epr-simple and epr-clocked

Abstract: In this note, I analyse the code and the data generated by M. Fodje's (2013) simulation programs "epr-simple" and "epr-clocked". They are written in Python were published on Github only, without any documentation at all of how they worked. Inspection of the code showed that they make use of the detection loophole and the coincidence loophole respectively. I evaluate them with appropriate modified Bell-CHSH type inequalities: the Larsson detection-loophole adjusted CHSH, and the Larsson-Gill coincidence-loophole adjusted CHSH. The experimental efficiencies turn out to be approximately eta = 81% (close to optimal) and gamma = 55% (far from optimal). The observed values of CHSH are, as they must be, within the appropriate adjusted bounds. Fodjes' detection-loophole model turns out to be very, very close to Pearle's famous 1970 model, so the efficiency is very close to optimal. The model also has the same defect as Pearle's: the joint detection rates exhibit signalling. The coincidence-loophole model is actually an elegant modification of the detection-loophole model. Because of this, however, it cannot lead to the optimal efficiency. Later versions of the programs included explanation of how they worked, including formulas, though still no reference whatever to the literature on the two loopholes which Fodje exploits. The documentation available now makes a lot of this paper superfluous. I plan to rewrite it as a very, very short note. I will also use the few jewels in the work in a more ambitious paper, still to be written, about the results of the bigger research project of which these experiments were a small part.