We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantum Physics

Title: A reasonable thing that just might work

Abstract: In 1964, John Bell proved that quantum mechanics is "unreasonable" (to use Einstein's term): there are nonlocal bipartite quantum correlations. But they are not the most nonlocal bipartite correlations consistent with relativistic causality ("no superluminal signalling"): also maximally nonlocal "superquantum" (or "PR-box") correlations are consistent with relativistic causality. I show that---unlike quantum correlations---these correlations do not have a classical limit consistent with relativistic causality. The generalization of this result to all stronger-than-quantum nonlocal correlations is a derivation of Tsirelson's bound---a theorem of quantum mechanics---from the three axioms of relativistic causality, nonlocality, and the existence of a classical limit. But is it reasonable to derive (a part of) quantum mechanics from the unreasonable axiom of nonlocality?! I consider replacing the nonlocality axiom with an equivalent axiom that even Bell and Einstein might have considered reasonable: an axiom of local retrocausality.
Comments: To appear in Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell's theorem, eds. S. Gao and M. Bell (Cambridge U. Press), 2015, in press
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1507.01588 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1507.01588v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Rohrlich [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 Jul 2015 20:00:36 GMT (27kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.