We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Rejection Odds and Rejection Ratios: A Proposal for Statistical Practice in Testing Hypotheses

Abstract: Much of science is (rightly or wrongly) driven by hypothesis testing. Even in situations where the hypothesis testing paradigm is correct, the common practice of basing inferences solely on p-values has been under intense criticism for over 50 years. We propose, as an alternative, the use of the odds of a correct rejection of the null hypothesis to incorrect rejection. Both pre-experimental versions (involving the power and Type I error) and post-experimental versions (depending on the actual data) are considered. Implementations are provided that range from depending only on the p-value to consideration of full Bayesian analysis. A surprise is that all implementations -- even the full Bayesian analysis -- have complete frequentist justification. Versions of our proposal can be implemented that require only minor modifications to existing practices yet overcome some of their most severe shortcomings.
Comments: 62-00, 62-01, 62A01
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1512.08552 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1512.08552v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Benjamin [view email]
[v1] Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:05:26 GMT (308kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.