Current browse context:
physics
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Quantum Physics
Title: Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate?
(Submitted on 1 Mar 2016 (v1), last revised 31 May 2017 (this version, v4))
Abstract: Recent experiments allowed concluding that Bell-type inequalities are indeed violated thus it is important to understand what it means and how can we explain the existence of strong correlations between outcomes of distant measurements. Do we have to announce that: Einstein was wrong, Nature is nonlocal and nonlocal correlations are produced due to the quantum magic and emerge, somehow, from outside space time? Fortunately such conclusions are unfounded because if supplementary parameters describing measuring instruments are correctly incorporated in a theoretical model then Bell-type inequalities may not be proven .We construct a simple probabilistic model explaining these correlations in a locally causal way. In our model measurement outcomes are neither predetermined nor produced in irreducibly random way. We explain in detail why, contrary to the general belief; an introduction of setting dependent parameters does not restrict experimenters' freedom of choice. Since the violation of Bell-type inequalities does not allow concluding that Nature is nonlocal and that quantum theory is complete thus the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate may not be closed. The continuation of this debate is not only important for a better understanding of Nature but also for various practical applications of quantum phenomena.
Submission history
From: Marian Kupczynski [view email][v1] Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:24:57 GMT (867kb)
[v2] Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:25:03 GMT (782kb)
[v3] Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:33:04 GMT (448kb)
[v4] Wed, 31 May 2017 08:56:21 GMT (652kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.