We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Statistical sensitiveness for science

Abstract: Research often necessitates of samples, yet obtaining large enough samples is not always possible. When it is, the researcher may use one of two methods for deciding upon the required sample size: rules-of-thumb, quick yet uncertain, and estimations for power, mathematically precise yet with the potential to overestimate or underestimate sample sizes when effect sizes are unknown. Misestimated sample sizes have negative repercussions in the form of increased costs, abandoned projects or abandoned publication of non-significant results. Here I describe a procedure for estimating sample sizes adequate for the testing approach which is most common in the behavioural, social, and biomedical sciences, that of tests of significance developed by Fisher. The procedure focuses on a desired minimum effect size for the research at hand and finds the minimum sample size required for capturing such effect size as a statistically significant result. In a similar fashion than power analyses, sensitiveness analyses can also be extended to finding the minimum effect for a given sample size a priori as well as to calculating sensitiveness a posteriori. The article provides a full tutorial for carrying out a sensitiveness analysis, as well as empirical support via simulation
Comments: 25 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables, 3 supplemental materials
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Other Statistics (stat.OT)
Cite as: arXiv:1604.01844 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1604.01844v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jose D. Perezgonzalez PhD [view email]
[v1] Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:28:28 GMT (310kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.