We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: Conversational flow in Oxford-style debates

Abstract: Public debates are a common platform for presenting and juxtaposing diverging views on important issues. In this work we propose a methodology for tracking how ideas flow between participants throughout a debate. We use this approach in a case study of Oxford-style debates---a competitive format where the winner is determined by audience votes---and show how the outcome of a debate depends on aspects of conversational flow. In particular, we find that winners tend to make better use of a debate's interactive component than losers, by actively pursuing their opponents' points rather than promoting their own ideas over the course of the conversation.
Comments: To appear at NAACL 2016. 5 pp, 1 fig. Data and other info available at this http URL
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1604.03114 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:1604.03114v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Justine Zhang [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:00:04 GMT (38kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.