We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition

Title: Estimating psychopathological networks: be careful what you wish for

Abstract: Network models, in which psychopathological disorders are conceptualised as a complex interplay of psychological and biological components, have been gaining substantial ground and popularity in recent psychopathological literature [1]. Regularly, network models contain a large number of unknown parameters, yet the sample sizes psychological research has to offer are limited. As such, general assumptions about the true network are introduced to reduce the number of free parameters. As these assumptions are incorporated in the estimation method, the resulting network will always be of the particular structure as assumed by the estimation method; a crucial, yet often ignored, aspect of psychopathological networks. For example, observing a sparse structure when we assume a sparse structure, does not imply that the true model is, in fact, sparse. To illustrate, we discuss a recently published paper that reveals a high-dimensional network of psychopathological symptoms [2] and furthermore show the effect of the assumption of sparsity in three simulation studies.
Comments: 22 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1604.08045 [q-bio.NC]
  (or arXiv:1604.08045v1 [q-bio.NC] for this version)

Submission history

From: Sacha Epskamp [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:57:51 GMT (997kb)
[v2] Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:52:45 GMT (997kb)
[v3] Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:53:07 GMT (269kb,D)
[v4] Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:18:25 GMT (270kb,D)
[v5] Mon, 11 Sep 2017 20:49:10 GMT (270kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.