We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title: Consciousness is Pattern Recognition

Abstract: This is a proof of the strong AI hypothesis, i.e. that machines can be conscious. It is a phenomenological proof that pattern-recognition and subjective consciousness are the same activity in different terms. Therefore, it proves that essential subjective processes of consciousness are computable, and identifies significant traits and requirements of a conscious system. Since Husserl, many philosophers have accepted that consciousness consists of memories of logical connections between an ego and external objects. These connections are called "intentions." Pattern recognition systems are achievable technical artifacts. The proof links this respected introspective philosophical theory of consciousness with technical art. The proof therefore endorses the strong AI hypothesis and may therefore also enable a theoretically-grounded form of artificial intelligence called a "synthetic intentionality," able to synthesize, generalize, select and repeat intentions. If the pattern recognition is reflexive, able to operate on the set of intentions, and flexible, with several methods of synthesizing intentions, an SI may be a particularly strong form of AI. Similarities and possible applications to several AI paradigms are discussed. The article then addresses some problems: The proof's limitations, reflexive cognition, Searles' Chinese room, and how an SI could "understand" "meanings" and "be creative."
Comments: 8 pages; Now describes the utility of the proof. Lemma A3 is improved. The root lemma is clarified. Included and excused some basic objections. Reordered the speculations, objections and excuses to be more coherent. Added paragraphs and references to aid some AI paradigms. Added my orcid and revised the abstract
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: I.2.0
Cite as: arXiv:1605.03009 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:1605.03009v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

Submission history

From: Ray Van De Walker Ray Van De Walker [view email]
[v1] Wed, 4 May 2016 20:19:05 GMT (257kb)
[v2] Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:44:09 GMT (165kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.