We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Two Stage Non-penalized Corrected Least Squares for High Dimensional Linear Models with Measurement error or Missing Covariates

Abstract: This paper provides an alternative to penalized estimators for estimation and vari- able selection in high dimensional linear regression models with measurement error or missing covariates. We propose estimation via bias corrected least squares after model selection. We show that by separating model selection and estimation, it is possible to achieve an improved rate of convergence of the L2 estimation error compared to the rate sqrt{s log p/n} achieved by simultaneous estimation and variable selection methods such as L1 penalized corrected least squares. If the correct model is selected with high probability then the L2 rate of convergence for the proposed method is indeed the oracle rate of sqrt{s/n}. Here s, p are the number of non zero parameters and the model dimension, respectively, and n is the sample size. Under very general model selection criteria, the proposed method is computationally simpler and statistically at least as efficient as the L1 penalized corrected least squares method, performs model selection without the availability of the bias correction matrix, and is able to provide estimates with only a small sub-block of the bias correction covariance matrix of order s x s in comparison to the p x p correction matrix required for computation of the L1 penalized version. Furthermore we show that the model selection requirements are met by a correlation screening type method and the L1 penalized corrected least squares method. Also, the proposed methodology when applied to the estimation of precision matrices with missing observations, is seen to perform at least as well as existing L1 penalty based methods. All results are supported empirically by a simulation study.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1605.03154 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1605.03154v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Abhishek Kaul [view email]
[v1] Tue, 10 May 2016 19:06:37 GMT (545kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.