We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: The latent logarithm

Abstract: Count or non-negative data are often log transformed to improve heteroscedasticity and scaling. To avoid undefined values where the data are zeros, a small pseudocount (e.g. 1) is added across the dataset prior to applying the transformation. This pseudocount considers neither the measured object's a priori abundance nor the confidence with which the measurement was made, making this practice convenient but statistically unfounded. I introduce here the latent logarithm, or lag. lag assumes that each observed measurement is a noisy realization of an unmeasured latent abundance. By taking the logarithm of this learned latent abundance, which reflects both sampling confidence/depth and the object's a priori abundance, lag provides a probabilistically coherent, stable, and intuitive alternative to the questionable, but conventional "log($x$ + pseudocount)."
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1605.06064 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1605.06064v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Surojit Biswas [view email]
[v1] Thu, 19 May 2016 17:41:58 GMT (451kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.