We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: More Powerful Multiple Testing in Randomized Experiments with Non-Compliance

Abstract: Two common concerns raised in analyses of randomized experiments are (i) appropriately handling issues of non-compliance, and (ii) appropriately adjusting for multiple tests (e.g., on multiple outcomes or subgroups). Although simple intention-to-treat (ITT) and Bonferroni methods are valid in terms of type I error, they can each lead to a substantial loss of power; when employing both simultaneously, the total loss may be severe. Alternatives exist to address each concern. Here we propose an analysis method for experiments involving both features that merges posterior predictive $p$-values for complier causal effects with randomization-based multiple comparisons adjustments; the results are valid familywise tests that are doubly advantageous: more powerful than both those based on standard ITT statistics and those using traditional multiple comparison adjustments. The operating characteristics and advantages of our method are demonstrated through a series of simulated experiments and an analysis of the United States Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Study, where our methods lead to different conclusions regarding the significance of estimated JTPA effects.
Comments: To appear in Statistica Sinica
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1605.07242 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1605.07242v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Natesh Pillai [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 May 2016 00:22:15 GMT (37kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.