We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ML

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Machine Learning

Title: An Iterative Smoothing Algorithm for Regression with Structured Sparsity

Abstract: High-dimensional regression or classification models are increasingly used to analyze biological data such as neuroimaging of genetic data. However, classical penalized algorithms produce dense solutions that are difficult to interpret without arbitrary thresholding. Alternatives based on sparsity-inducing penalties suffer from coefficient instability. Structured sparsity is a promising way to force the solution to adhere to some domain-specific constraints and thus offering new perspectives in biomarker identification. We propose a generic optimization framework that can combine any smooth convex loss function with: (i) penalties whose proximal operator is known and (ii) with a large range of complex, non-smooth convex structured penalties such as total variation, or overlapping group lasso. Although many papers have addressed a similar goal, few have tackled it in such a generic way and in the context of high-dimensional data. The proposed continuation algorithm (CONESTA) dynamically smooths the complex penalties to avoid the computation of proximal operators, that are either not known or expensive to compute. The decreasing sequence of smoothing parameters is dynamically adapted, using the duality gap, in order to maintain the optimal convergence speed towards any desired precision. First, we demonstrate that CONESTA achieves an improved convergence rate than classical (without continuation) proximal gradient smoothing. Second, experiments conducted on both simulated and experimental MRI data, exhibit that CONESTA outperforms the excessive gap method, ADMM, classical proximal gradient smoothing and inexact FISTA in terms of convergence speed and/or precision of the solution. Third, on the experimental MRI data set, we establish the superiority of structured sparsity (l1 and total variation) in terms of the recovery of meaningful and stable groups of predictive variables.
Comments: 33 pages, 4 figures, preprint
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1605.09658 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:1605.09658v3 [stat.ML] for this version)

Submission history

From: Edouard Duchesnay [view email]
[v1] Tue, 31 May 2016 15:09:13 GMT (1513kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:15:58 GMT (1513kb,D)
[v3] Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:15:38 GMT (1513kb,D)
[v4] Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:07:19 GMT (1517kb,D)
[v5] Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:54:38 GMT (2811kb,D)
[v6] Sun, 22 Apr 2018 11:29:40 GMT (2831kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.