We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Causal inference to detect selection bias in road safety epidemiology

Abstract: In the field of road safety, it is common to use responsibility analyses to assess the effect of a given factor on the risk of being responsible for an accident, among drivers involved in an accident only. Even if this design is now widely adopted in the field, the question of selection bias is often raised. The structural Causal Model framework now provides valuable tools to assess causal effects from observational data and identify selection bias. In this article, we briefly review recent results regarding the recoverability of causal effects from selection biased data, and apply them to the case of responsibility analyses. Our objective is to formally determine whether causal effects can be unbiasedly estimated through this type of analyses, when available data are restricted to severe accidents, as it is commonly the case in practice. However, because speed has a direct effect on the severity of the accident, we show that causal odds-ratios are not estimable from responsibility analyses. We present numerical results to illustrate our argument, the magnitude of the bias and to discuss recent results from real data.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1607.03775 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1607.03775v5 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Marine Dufournet [view email]
[v1] Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:46:46 GMT (20kb)
[v2] Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:39:57 GMT (28kb,D)
[v3] Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:18:35 GMT (54kb,D)
[v4] Mon, 7 May 2018 15:41:02 GMT (54kb,D)
[v5] Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:00:33 GMT (36kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.