Title: Effect heterogeneity and variable selection for standardizing causal effects to a target population

Abstract: Randomized trials, and even observational studies used for causal inference, are rarely representative of the populations in which the results will be used to inform clinical decision making. In order to account for differences between populations, we may consider standardizing results to a target population. In this paper, we discuss different approaches for reasoning about which covariates must be standardized over, and different approaches for computing the standardized causal effect in the target population. We compare and contrast these approaches, with an emphasis on evaluating whether the necessary assumptions underlying each method can be expected to hold in standard clinical and pharmacoepidemiological settings. We conclude that the choice must be informed by expert beliefs about which assumptions are most likely to be approximately true in the specific scientific context.