We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.ST

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

Title: The Lindley paradox: The loss of resolution in Bayesian inference

Abstract: There are three principle paradigms of statistics: Bayesian, frequentist and information-based inference. Although these paradigms are in agreement in some contexts, the Lindley paradox describes a class of problems, models of unknown dimension, where conflicting conclusions are generated by frequentist and Bayesian inference. This conflict can materially affect the scientific conclusions. Understanding the Lindley paradox---where it applies, why it occurs, and how it can be avoided---is therefore essential to the understanding of statistical analysis. In this paper, we revisit the Lindley paradox in the context of a simple biophysical application. We describe how predictive and postdictive measures of model performance provide a natural framework for understanding the Lindley paradox. We then identify methods which result in optimal experimental resolution for discovery.
Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures, and Appendix
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST)
Cite as: arXiv:1610.09433 [math.ST]
  (or arXiv:1610.09433v2 [math.ST] for this version)

Submission history

From: Colin LaMont [view email]
[v1] Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:53:20 GMT (1514kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:30:26 GMT (808kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.