We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Checking for prior-data conflict using prior to posterior divergences

Abstract: When using complex Bayesian models to combine information, the checking for consistency of the information being combined is good statistical practice. Here a new method is developed for detecting prior-data conflicts in Bayesian models based on comparing the observed value of a prior to posterior divergence to its distribution under the prior predictive distribution for the data. The divergence measure used in our model check is a measure of how much beliefs have changed from prior to posterior, and can be thought of as a measure of the overall size of a relative belief function. It is shown that the proposed method is intuitive, has desirable properties, can be extended to hierarchical settings, and is related asymptotically to Jeffreys' and reference prior distributions. In the case where calculations are difficult, the use of variational approximations as a way of relieving the computational burden is suggested. The methods are compared in a number of examples with an alternative but closely related approach in the literature based on the prior predictive distribution of a minimal sufficient statistic.
Comments: Corrected typos in Example 3.2 and Section 4
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1611.00113 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1611.00113v3 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Xueou Wang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:00:56 GMT (465kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 4 Nov 2016 01:31:29 GMT (468kb,D)
[v3] Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:09:04 GMT (468kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.