We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Why comparing survival curves between two subgroups may be misleading

Abstract: We analyse an issue when comparing survival curves between two subgroups. We show that there is a direct relationship between estimates of subgroups' survival at a time point and positive and negative predictive values in the binary classification settings. Our findings present a case where current methods of comparing survival curves between subgroups may be misleading. We think that this ought to be taken into account during the validation of prognostic diagnostic tests that predict two prognostic subgroups for a given disease or treatment, when the validation data set consists of censored data.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1611.01480 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1611.01480v2 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Damjan Krstajic [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Nov 2016 18:26:00 GMT (712kb)
[v2] Fri, 14 May 2021 14:56:08 GMT (565kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.