We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: The statistical significance filter leads to overconfident expectations of replicability

Abstract: We show that publishing results using the statistical significance filter---publishing only when the p-value is less than 0.05---leads to a vicious cycle of overoptimistic expectation of the replicability of results. First, we show analytically that when true statistical power is relatively low, computing power based on statistically significant results will lead to overestimates of power. Then, we present a case study using 10 experimental comparisons drawn from a recently published meta-analysis in psycholinguistics (J\"ager et al., 2017). We show that the statistically significant results yield an illusion of replicability. This illusion holds even if the researcher doesn't conduct any formal power analysis but just uses statistical significance to informally assess robustness (i.e., replicability) of results.
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures. Submitted to the conference Cognitive Science 2017, London, UK
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1702.00556 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1702.00556v2 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Shravan Vasishth [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 Feb 2017 07:14:21 GMT (65kb,D)
[v2] Sun, 14 May 2017 06:24:02 GMT (65kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.