We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Applications

Title: Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments

Abstract: Recidivism prediction instruments (RPI's) provide decision makers with an assessment of the likelihood that a criminal defendant will reoffend at a future point in time. While such instruments are gaining increasing popularity across the country, their use is attracting tremendous controversy. Much of the controversy concerns potential discriminatory bias in the risk assessments that are produced. This paper discusses several fairness criteria that have recently been applied to assess the fairness of recidivism prediction instruments. We demonstrate that the criteria cannot all be simultaneously satisfied when recidivism prevalence differs across groups. We then show how disparate impact can arise when a recidivism prediction instrument fails to satisfy the criterion of error rate balance.
Comments: The short conference version of the paper was previously uploaded as arXiv:1610.07524
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1703.00056 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:1703.00056v1 [stat.AP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Alexandra Chouldechova [view email]
[v1] Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:12:37 GMT (60kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.