We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.ST

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

Title: Statistical foundations for assessing the difference between the classical and weighted-Gini betas

Abstract: The `beta' is one of the key quantities in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). In statistical language, the beta can be viewed as the slope of the regression line fitted to financial returns on the market against the returns on the asset under consideration. The insurance counterpart of CAPM, called the weighted insurance pricing model (WIPM), gives rise to the so-called weighted-Gini beta. The aforementioned two betas may or may not coincide, depending on the form of the underlying regression function, and this has profound implications when designing portfolios and allocating risk capital. To facilitate these tasks, in this paper we develop large-sample statistical inference results that, in a straightforward fashion, imply confidence intervals for, and hypothesis tests about, the equality of the two betas.
Comments: 21 pages
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST)
MSC classes: 62G05, 62G20, 62P05, 62P20
Cite as: arXiv:1706.05510 [math.ST]
  (or arXiv:1706.05510v3 [math.ST] for this version)

Submission history

From: Nadezhda Gribkova Dr. [view email]
[v1] Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:19:39 GMT (15kb)
[v2] Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:17:02 GMT (15kb)
[v3] Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:33:17 GMT (16kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.