We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ML

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods

Title: Most Ligand-Based Classification Benchmarks Reward Memorization Rather than Generalization

Abstract: Undetected overfitting can occur when there are significant redundancies between training and validation data. We describe AVE, a new measure of training-validation redundancy for ligand-based classification problems that accounts for the similarity amongst inactive molecules as well as active. We investigated seven widely-used benchmarks for virtual screening and classification, and show that the amount of AVE bias strongly correlates with the performance of ligand-based predictive methods irrespective of the predicted property, chemical fingerprint, similarity measure, or previously-applied unbiasing techniques. Therefore, it may be that the previously-reported performance of most ligand-based methods can be explained by overfitting to benchmarks rather than good prospective accuracy.
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00403
Cite as: arXiv:1706.06619 [q-bio.QM]
  (or arXiv:1706.06619v2 [q-bio.QM] for this version)

Submission history

From: Abraham Heifets [view email]
[v1] Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:47:46 GMT (2729kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 9 May 2018 20:59:37 GMT (2332kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.