References & Citations
Quantitative Finance > Portfolio Management
Title: The "Size Premium" in Equity Markets: Where is the Risk?
(Submitted on 2 Aug 2017 (v1), last revised 23 Aug 2017 (this version, v2))
Abstract: We find that when measured in terms of dollar-turnover, and once $\beta$-neutralised and Low-Vol neutralised, the Size Effect is alive and well. With a long term t-stat of $5.1$, the "Cold-Minus-Hot" (CMH) anomaly is certainly not less significant than other well-known factors such as Value or Quality. As compared to market-cap based SMB, CMH portfolios are much less anti-correlated to the Low-Vol anomaly. In contrast with standard risk premia, size-based portfolios are found to be virtually unskewed. In fact, the extreme risk of these portfolios is dominated by the large cap leg; small caps actually have a positive (rather than negative) skewness. The only argument that favours a risk premium interpretation at the individual stock level is that the extreme drawdowns are more frequent for small cap/turnover stocks, even after accounting for volatility. This idiosyncratic risk is however clearly diversifiable.
Submission history
From: Jean-Philippe Bouchaud [view email][v1] Wed, 2 Aug 2017 08:31:17 GMT (323kb)
[v2] Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:16:40 GMT (324kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.