We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

Title: Bootstrap of residual processes in regression: to smooth or not to smooth ?

Abstract: In this paper we consider a location model of the form $Y = m(X) + \varepsilon$, where $m(\cdot)$ is the unknown regression function, the error $\varepsilon$ is independent of the $p$-dimensional covariate $X$ and $E(\varepsilon)=0$. Given i.i.d. data $(X_1,Y_1),\ldots,(X_n,Y_n)$ and given an estimator $\hat m(\cdot)$ of the function $m(\cdot)$ (which can be parametric or nonparametric of nature), we estimate the distribution of the error term $\varepsilon$ by the empirical distribution of the residuals $Y_i-\hat m(X_i)$, $i=1,\ldots,n$. To approximate the distribution of this estimator, Koul and Lahiri (1994) and Neumeyer (2008, 2009) proposed bootstrap procedures, based on smoothing the residuals either before or after drawing bootstrap samples. So far it has been an open question whether a classical non-smooth residual bootstrap is asymptotically valid in this context. In this paper we solve this open problem, and show that the non-smooth residual bootstrap is consistent. We illustrate this theoretical result by means of simulations, that show the accuracy of this bootstrap procedure for various models, testing procedures and sample sizes.
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1712.02685 [math.ST]
  (or arXiv:1712.02685v1 [math.ST] for this version)

Submission history

From: Natalie Neumeyer [view email]
[v1] Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:52:00 GMT (23kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.