We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Linking Administrative Data: An Evolutionary Schema

Abstract: Statistics New Zealand (Stats NZ) has committed unreservedly to an administrative data first policy. Thus, all new methods used at Stats NZ are to be viewed within this context and discussing strategies for using administrative data is an integral part of every working day. As statistical methodologists, the three authors were drawn into these discussions. Like most methodologists, the authors see surveys and the publications of their results as a process where estimation is the key tool to achieve the final goal of an accurate statistical output. Randomness and sampling exists to support this goal, and early on it was clear to us that the incoming it-is-what-it-is data sources were not randomly selected. These sources were obviously biased and thus would produce biased estimates. So, we set out to design a strategy to deal with this issue. This led us to the concept of representativeness which is closely related to statistical bias but has a wider context invoking both randomness and judgement. The representativeness issue was the principal question that we set out to answer. The necessary components that we gathered for our solution are summarized in the paper.
Keywords: Representativeness, Timeline Databases, Statistical Registers, Estimation
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1712.08522 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1712.08522v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Allyson Seyb [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:31:14 GMT (1209kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.