We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

physics.hist-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

Title: Demolishing prejudices to get to the foundations: a criterion of demarcation for fundamentality

Abstract: In this paper, we reject commonly accepted views on fundamentality in science, either based on bottom-up construction or top-down reduction to isolate the alleged fundamental entities. We do not introduce any new scientific methodology, but rather describe the current scientific methodology and show how it entails an inherent search for foundations of science. This is achieved by phrasing (minimal sets of) metaphysical assumptions into falsifiable statements and define as fundamental those that survive empirical tests. The ones that are falsified are rejected, and the corresponding philosophical concept is demolished as a prejudice. Furthermore, we show the application of this criterion in concrete examples of the search for fundamentality in quantum physics and biophysics.
Comments: Essay originally prepared for the FQXi Essay contest 2018, "What if fundamental?". Accepted for publication in "Foundations of Science" after major revision. 14 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Journal reference: Found Sci 25, 827-843 (2020)
DOI: 10.1007/s10699-019-09629-0
Cite as: arXiv:1802.04400 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:1802.04400v3 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Flavio Del Santo [view email]
[v1] Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:02:52 GMT (368kb,D)
[v2] Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:25:41 GMT (371kb,D)
[v3] Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:22:41 GMT (372kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.