We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Against Collapses, Purity and Separability Within the Definition of Quantum Entanglement

Abstract: In this paper we we will argue against the orthodox definition of quantum entanglement which has been implicitly grounded on several widespread (metaphysical) presuppositions which have no relation whatsoever to the formalism of QM. We will show how these presuppositions have been introduced through a naive interpretation of the quantum mathematical structure which assumes dogmatically that the theory talks about "small particles" represented by pure states (in general, superpositions) which suddenly "collapse" when a measurement takes place. In the second part of this paper we will present a non-collapse approach to QM which makes no use whatsoever of particle metaphysics, escaping the need to make reference to space-time separability or the restriction to certain predictions of definite valued binary properties. Our paper ends up concluding the essential need to redefine the notion of quantum entanglement, at least in the cases of: i) non-collapse interpretations of QM; or, ii) any other interpretation which abandons the idea that QM makes reference to "small particles".
Comments: This paper is an extended version of the discussion and arguments presented in the first part of arXiv:1807.08344
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1808.10030 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1808.10030v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Christian de Ronde [view email]
[v1] Sat, 25 Aug 2018 15:35:58 GMT (25kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.