We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

gr-qc

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Title: Non-parametric inference of the neutron star equation of state from gravitational wave observations

Abstract: We develop a non-parametric method for inferring the universal neutron star (NS) equation of state (EOS) from gravitational wave (GW) observations. Many different possible realizations of the EOS are generated with a Gaussian process conditioned on a set of nuclear-theoretic models. These synthetic EOSs are causal and thermodynamically stable by construction, span a broad region of the pressure-density plane, and can be selected to satisfy astrophysical constraints on the NS mass. Associating every synthetic EOS with a pair of component masses $M_{1,2}$ and calculating the corresponding tidal deformabilities $\Lambda_{1,2}$, we perform Monte Carlo integration over the GW likelihood for $M_{1,2}$ and $\Lambda_{1,2}$ to directly infer a posterior process for the NS EOS. We first demonstrate that the method can accurately recover an injected GW signal, and subsequently use it to analyze data from GW170817, finding a canonical deformability of $\Lambda_{1.4} = 160^{+448}_{-113}$ and $p(2\rho_{\mathrm{nuc}})=1.35^{+1.8}_{-1.2}\times 10^{34}~\mathrm{dyn}/\mathrm{cm}^2$ for the pressure at twice the nuclear saturation density at 90$\%$ confidence, in agreement with previous studies, when assuming a loose EOS prior. With a prior more tightly constrained to resemble the theoretical EOS models, we recover $\Lambda_{1.4} = 556^{+163}_{-172}$ and $p(2\rho_{\mathrm{nuc}})=4.73^{+1.4}_{-2.5}\times 10^{34}~\mathrm{dyn}/\mathrm{cm}^2$. We further infer the maximum NS mass supported by the EOS to be $M_\mathrm{max}=2.09^{+0.37}_{-0.16}$ ($2.04^{+0.22}_{-0.002}$) $M_\odot$ with the loose (tight) prior. The Bayes factor between the two priors is $B^{\mathcal{A}}_{\mathcal{I}} \simeq 1.12$, implying that neither is strongly preferred by the data and suggesting that constraints on the EOS from GW170817 alone may be relatively prior-dominated.
Comments: 27 pages, 12 figures; references added
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 99, 084049 (2019)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.084049
Cite as: arXiv:1811.12529 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:1811.12529v2 [gr-qc] for this version)

Submission history

From: Philippe Landry [view email]
[v1] Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:05:21 GMT (9537kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 5 Dec 2018 18:19:00 GMT (9435kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.