We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Condensed Matter > Materials Science

Title: NOMAD 2018 Kaggle Competition: Solving Materials Science Challenges Through Crowd Sourcing

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in the field of materials science, where statistical estimates of computed properties are employed to rapidly examine the chemical space for new compounds. However, a systematic comparison of several ML models for this domain has been hindered by the scarcity of appropriate datasets of materials properties, as well as the lack of thorough benchmarking studies. To address this, a public data-analytics competition was organized by the Novel Materials Discovery (NOMAD) Centre of Excellence and hosted by the on-line platform Kaggle using a dataset of $3\,000$ (Al$_x$ Ga$_y$ In$_z$)$_2$ O$_3$ compounds (with $x+y+z = 1$). The aim of this challenge was to identify the best ML model for the prediction of two key physical properties that are relevant for optoelectronic applications: the electronic band gap energy and the crystalline formation energy. In this contribution, we present a summary of the top three ML approaches of the competition including the 1st place solution based on a crystal graph representation that is new for ML of the properties of materials. The 2nd place model combined many candidate descriptors from a set of compositional, atomic environment-based, and average structural properties with the light gradient-boosting machine regression model. The 3rd place model employed the smooth overlap of atomic positions representation with a neural network. To gain insight into whether the representation or the regression model determines the overall model performance, nine ML models obtained by combining the representations and regression models of the top three approaches were compared by looking at the correlations among prediction errors. At fixed representation, the largest correlation is observed in predictions made with kernel ridge regression and neural network, reflecting a similar performance on the same test set samples.
Subjects: Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-019-0239-3
Cite as: arXiv:1812.00085 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
  (or arXiv:1812.00085v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)

Submission history

From: Luca Ghiringhelli [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Nov 2018 22:55:22 GMT (4105kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.