We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

quant-ph

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Abstract: We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.
Comments: 3 pages, 2 figures; this is our Reply to the Comment in arXiv:1805.12171v1
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. A 99, 026104 (2019)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104
Cite as: arXiv:1901.05673 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1901.05673v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Berthold-Georg Englert [view email]
[v1] Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:13:31 GMT (12kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.