Title: Against the Tyranny of Pure States in Quantum Theory

Abstract: In this paper we provide arguments against the dominant role played by the notion of pure sate within the orthodox textbook account of quantum mechanics. We will argue that the origin of this notion is intrinsically related to the widespread empirical-positivist understanding of physics according to which 'theories describe actual observations of subjects (or agents)'. We will then show how there exists, within the notion of pure state, an inconsistent scrambling of two mutually incompatible definitions. On the one hand, a contextual (basis dependent) operational definition which attempts to provide an intuitive physical grasp in terms of the certain predictions of measurement outcomes; and on the other hand, an invariant (basis independent) purely abstract mathematical definition which has no direct physical content. We end the paper with a discussion of a possible way of out of this metaphysical-operational conundrum through following an interpretation of the Born rule in terms of the intensive quantification of physical existents.