We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.LG

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Machine Learning

Title: Provable Low Rank Phase Retrieval

Abstract: We study the Low Rank Phase Retrieval (LRPR) problem defined as follows: recover an $n \times q$ matrix $X^*$ of rank $r$ from a different and independent set of $m$ phaseless (magnitude-only) linear projections of each of its columns. To be precise, we need to recover $X^*$ from $y_k := |A_k{}' x^*_k|, k=1,2,\dots, q$ when the measurement matrices $A_k$ are mutually independent. Here $y_k$ is an $m$ length vector, $A_k$ is an $n \times m$ matrix, and $'$ denotes matrix transpose. The question is when can we solve LRPR with $m \ll n$? A reliable solution can enable fast and low-cost phaseless dynamic imaging, e.g., Fourier ptychographic imaging of live biological specimens. In this work, we develop the first provably correct approach for solving this LRPR problem. Our proposed algorithm, Alternating Minimization for Low-Rank Phase Retrieval (AltMinLowRaP), is an AltMin based solution and hence is also provably fast (converges geometrically). Our guarantee shows that AltMinLowRaP solves LRPR to $\epsilon$ accuracy, with high probability, as long as $m q \ge C n r^4 \log(1/\epsilon)$, the matrices $A_k$ contain i.i.d. standard Gaussian entries, and the right singular vectors of $X^*$ satisfy the incoherence assumption from matrix completion literature. Here $C$ is a numerical constant that only depends on the condition number of $X^*$ and on its incoherence parameter. Its time complexity is only $ C mq nr \log^2(1/\epsilon)$. Since even the linear (with phase) version of the above problem is not fully solved, the above result is also the first complete solution and guarantee for the linear case. Finally, we also develop a simple extension of our results for the dynamic LRPR setting.
Comments: A short version of this work is in ICML 2019, this longer version is published in IEEE Trans. Info. Th on March 2020. Fixing minor but important errors in Lemmas 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 statements and in proof of the Term1 bound. No change to Theorem statement
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1902.04972 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:1902.04972v5 [cs.LG] for this version)

Submission history

From: Seyedehsara Nayer [view email]
[v1] Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:56:12 GMT (170kb,D)
[v2] Tue, 23 Apr 2019 05:15:23 GMT (122kb,D)
[v3] Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:23:55 GMT (1779kb,D)
[v4] Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:47:13 GMT (1348kb,D)
[v5] Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:44:11 GMT (665kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.