References & Citations
Economics > Econometrics
Title: The Empirical Content of Binary Choice Models
(Submitted on 28 Feb 2019 (v1), last revised 1 Oct 2020 (this version, v4))
Abstract: An important goal of empirical demand analysis is choice and welfare prediction on counterfactual budget sets arising from potential policy-interventions. Such predictions are more credible when made without arbitrary functional-form/distributional assumptions, and instead based solely on economic rationality, i.e. that choice is consistent with utility maximization by a heterogeneous population. This paper investigates nonparametric economic rationality in the empirically important context of binary choice. We show that under general unobserved heterogeneity, economic rationality is equivalent to a pair of Slutsky-like shape-restrictions on choice-probability functions. The forms of these restrictions differ from Slutsky-inequalities for continuous goods. Unlike McFadden-Richter's stochastic revealed preference, our shape-restrictions (a) are global, i.e. their forms do not depend on which and how many budget-sets are observed, (b) are closed-form, hence easy to impose on parametric/semi/non-parametric models in practical applications, and (c) provide computationally simple, theory-consistent bounds on demand and welfare predictions on counterfactual budget-sets.
Submission history
From: Debopam Bhattacharya [view email][v1] Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:57:42 GMT (15kb)
[v2] Mon, 25 May 2020 11:24:43 GMT (26kb)
[v3] Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:19:42 GMT (31kb)
[v4] Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:43:21 GMT (31kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.