We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.HE

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Title: A meta analysis of core-collapse supernova $^{56}$Ni masses

Abstract: A fundamental property determining the transient behaviour of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) is the amount of radioactive $^{56}$Ni synthesised in the explosion. Using established methods, this is a relatively easy parameter to extract from observations. Here I provide a meta analysis of all published $^{56}$Ni masses for CCSNe. Collating a total of 258 literature $^{56}$Ni masses I compare distributions of the main CCSN types: SNeII; SNeIIb; SNeIb; SNeIc; and SNeIcBL. Using these published values, I calculate a median $^{56}$Ni mass of 0.032${\rm\ M}_\odot$ for SNeII (N=115), 0.102${\rm\ M}_\odot$ (N=27) for SNeIIb, SNeIb = 0.163${\rm\ M}_\odot$ (N=33), SNeIc = 0.155${\rm\ M}_\odot$ (N=48), and SNeIcBL = 0.369${\rm\ M}_\odot$ (N=32). On average, stripped-enevelope SNe (SE-SNe: IIb; Ib; Ic; and Ic-BL) have much higher values than SNeII. These observed distributions are compared to those predicted from neutrino-driven explosion models. While the SNII distribution follows model predictions, the SE-SNe have a significant fraction of events with $^{56}$Ni masses much higher than predicted. If the majority of published $^{56}$Ni masses are to be believed, these results imply significant differences in the progenitor structures and/or explosion properties between SNeII and SE-SNe. However, such distinct progenitor and explosion properties are not currently favoured in the literature. Alternatively, the popular methods used to estimate $^{56}$Ni masses for SE-SNe may not be accurate. Possible issues with these methods are discussed, as are the implications of true $^{56}$Ni mass differences on progenitor properties of different CCSNe.
Comments: Resubmitted to A&A after referee's first review. Comments welcome. 9 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE); Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Journal reference: A&A 628, A7 (2019)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935027
Cite as: arXiv:1906.00761 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:1906.00761v1 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)

Submission history

From: Joseph Anderson [view email]
[v1] Mon, 27 May 2019 18:00:01 GMT (176kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.