We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Title: Bayesian analysis of running holographic Ricci dark energy

Abstract: Running vacuum models is an excellent description of slowly varying dark energy, where the density is varying with the even powers of Hubble paramater. Holographic Ricci dark energy evolving through its interaction with dark matter is a natural choice in this regard We have analyzed the relative significance of two versions of this model in the light of SNIa, CMB, BAO and Hubble data sets using the method Bayesian inferences. The first one is, running holographic Ricci dark energy (rhrde) having a constant additive term in its density form and the second is one having no additive constant, instead the interaction of rhrde with dark matter is accounted through a phenomenological coupling term. The Bayes factor of these models in comparison with the standard $\Lambda$CDM have been obtained by calculating the likelihood of each model for five different data combinations, Hubble parameter data, SNIa(307)+CMB+BAO, SNIa(307)+CMB+BAO+Hubble data, SNIa(580)+CMB+BAO and SNIa(580)+CMB+BAO+Hubble data. The priors for the model parameters, in order to get the likelihood of the model, are obtained by getting the width of the Gaussian distribution of the parameters with respect to the corresponding observational data combination. Our analysis have shown that, the model 1 is not worth more than a bare mention compared to $\Lambda$CDM model, as its Bayes factor is between one and three for all the data combinations. While the evidence for model 2, is definite even though not so strong against the standard model for the full data set SNIa(580)+CMB+BAO+Hubble, since the corresponding Bayes factor is greater than three. For other data combinations model 2 is similar in status as model 1 in comparison with $\Lambda$CDM model. At the outset our analysis supporting a slowly varying dark energy instead of a strict cosmological constant.
Comments: 15 pages and 5 figures
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:1906.08532 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:1906.08532v2 [gr-qc] for this version)

Submission history

From: Titus K Mathew [view email]
[v1] Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:02:18 GMT (103kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:50:40 GMT (105kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.