We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Astrophysics > Earth and Planetary Astrophysics

Title: Are long-term $N$-body simulations reliable?

Authors: David M. Hernandez (1 and 2), Sam Hadden (1), Junichiro Makino (2) ((1) Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, (2) RIKEN CCS)
Abstract: $N$-body integrations are used to model a wide range of astrophysical dynamics, but they suffer from errors which make their orbits diverge exponentially in time from the correct orbits. Over long time-scales, their reliability needs to be established. We address this reliability by running a three-body planetary system over about $200$ e-folding times. Using nearby initial conditions, we can construct statistics of the long-term phase-space structure and compare to rough estimates of resonant widths of the system. We compared statistics for a wide range of numerical methods, including a Runge--Kutta method, Wisdom--Holman method, symplectic corrector methods, and a method by Laskar and Robutel. "Improving" an integrator did not increase the phase space accuracy, but simply increasing the number of initial conditions did. In fact, the statistics of a higher order symplectic corrector method were inconsistent with the other methods in one test.
Comments: 14 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables. Matches accepted MNRAS version
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa388
Cite as: arXiv:1910.08667 [astro-ph.EP]
  (or arXiv:1910.08667v2 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)

Submission history

From: David Hernandez [view email]
[v1] Sat, 19 Oct 2019 00:28:36 GMT (4723kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 7 Feb 2020 02:07:02 GMT (6197kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.