We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CL

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled

Abstract: Recent advancements in neural language modelling make it possible to rapidly generate vast amounts of human-sounding text. The capabilities of humans and automatic discriminators to detect machine-generated text have been a large source of research interest, but humans and machines rely on different cues to make their decisions. Here, we perform careful benchmarking and analysis of three popular sampling-based decoding strategies---top-$k$, nucleus sampling, and untruncated random sampling---and show that improvements in decoding methods have primarily optimized for fooling humans. This comes at the expense of introducing statistical abnormalities that make detection easy for automatic systems. We also show that though both human and automatic detector performance improve with longer excerpt length, even multi-sentence excerpts can fool expert human raters over 30% of the time. Our findings reveal the importance of using both human and automatic detectors to assess the humanness of text generation systems.
Comments: ACL 2020 Camera Ready
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.00650 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:1911.00650v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Duckworth [view email]
[v1] Sat, 2 Nov 2019 04:52:00 GMT (1347kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 7 May 2020 21:32:16 GMT (2130kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.