Current browse context:
cs.SE
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Computer Science > Software Engineering
Title: The role of formalism in system requirements (extended version)
(Submitted on 6 Nov 2019 (v1), revised 12 Apr 2020 (this version, v4), latest version 16 Apr 2020 (v6))
Abstract: A major determinant of the quality of software systems is the quality of their requirements, which should be both understandable and precise. Most requirements are written in natural language, good for understandability but lacking in precision.
To make requirements precise, researchers have for years advocated the use of mathematics-based notations and methods, known as "formal". Many exist, differing in their style, scope and applicability. The present survey discusses some of the main formal approaches and compares them to informal methods.
The analysis uses a set of 9 complementary criteria, such as level of abstraction, tool availability, traceability support. It classifies the approaches into five categories: general-purpose, natural-language, graph/automata, other mathematical notations, seamless (programming-language-based). It includes examples from all of these categories, altogether 22 different methods, including for example SysML, Relax, Eiffel, Event-B, Alloy.
The review discusses a number of open questions, including seamlessness, the role of tools and education, and how to make industrial applications benefit more from the contributions of formal approaches.
Submission history
From: Bertrand Meyer [view email][v1] Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:40:16 GMT (2727kb,D)
[v2] Sat, 4 Apr 2020 14:03:04 GMT (2734kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 7 Apr 2020 07:35:39 GMT (2727kb,D)
[v4] Sun, 12 Apr 2020 09:26:44 GMT (2917kb,D)
[v5] Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:02:44 GMT (2920kb,D)
[v6] Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:42:18 GMT (2920kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.