We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Discrete Mathematics

Title: Paired Domination versus Domination and Packing Number in Graphs

Abstract: Given a graph $G=(V(G), E(G))$, the size of a minimum dominating set, minimum paired dominating set, and a minimum total dominating set of a graph $G$ are denoted by $\gamma(G)$, $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G)$, and $\gamma_{t}(G)$, respectively. For a positive integer $k$, a $k$-packing in $G$ is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ in $S$, the distance between $u$ and $v$ is at least $k+1$. The $k$-packing number is the order of a largest $k$-packing and is denoted by $\rho_{k}(G)$. It is well known that $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G) \le 2\gamma(G)$. In this paper, we prove that it is NP-hard to determine whether $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G) = 2\gamma(G)$ even for bipartite graphs. We provide a simple characterization of trees with $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G) = 2\gamma(G)$, implying a polynomial-time recognition algorithm. We also prove that even for a bipartite graph, it is NP-hard to determine whether $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G)=\gamma_{t}(G)$. We finally prove that it is both NP-hard to determine whether $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G)=2\rho_{4}(G)$ and whether $\gamma_{\rm pr}(G)=2\rho_{3}(G)$.
Comments: 14 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM); Combinatorics (math.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.04098 [cs.DM]
  (or arXiv:1911.04098v1 [cs.DM] for this version)

Submission history

From: Didem Gözüpek [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:24:11 GMT (21kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.