We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:


References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

Title: Arbitrage opportunities in publication and ghost authors

Abstract: In some research evaluation systems, credit awarded to an article depends on the number of co-authors on the article with total credit to the article increasing with the number of co-authors. There are many examples of such evaluation systems (e.g., the United States National Research Council evaluation of graduate programs gave full credit to each co-author). Such credit systems run the risk of encouraging ghost or honorary authorships. In a recent article, Antonio Osorio and Lutz Bornmann (2019) propose a scheme to discourage ghost authorships but increase the total credit to a paper when co-authorships increase. It is shown that if articles are valued more highly as the number of co-authorships increases, then there are opportunities to increase credit by mutually agreeing to add each other as authors. Unrelated authors of unrelated papers may all benefit by expanding their co-author list. I call this phenomena arbitrage--a term borrowed from economics and finance--since the content of the articles do not change, but the value increases by moving to a "market" of more co-authors where articles are valued differently.
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
Journal reference: Journal of Informetrics (2020)
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101016
Cite as: arXiv:1911.05197 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:1911.05197v1 [cs.DL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Lawrence Smolinsky [view email]
[v1] Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:14:17 GMT (138kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.