We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cond-mat.stat-mech

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Condensed Matter > Statistical Mechanics

Title: Self-organized bistability: is it relevant for brain dynamics?

Abstract: Self-organized bistability is the counterpart of "self-organized criticality" (SOC), for systems tuning themselves to the edge of bistability of a discontinuous/first-order phase transition, rather than to the critical point of a continuous/second order one. The equations defining the theory of SOB turn out to be very similar to a mesoscopic (Landau-Ginzburg) theory recently proposed to describe the dynamics in the cerebral cortex. This theory describes the bistable/oscillating neuronal activity of coupled mesoscopic patches of cortex, homeostatically regulated by short-term synaptic plasticity. However, the theory for cortex dynamics entails significant differences with respect to SOB, including the lack of a (bulk) conservation law, the absence of a perfect separation of timescales between driving and dissipation and, the fact that in the former there is a parameter that controls the overall system state (in blatant contrast with the very idea of self-organization). Here, we scrutinize --by employing a combination of analytical and computational tools-- the analogies and differences between both theories and explore whether in some limit SOB could play an important role to explain the emergence of scale-invariant neuronal avalanches observed empirically in the cortex. We conclude that actually, in the limit of infinitely slow synaptic-dynamics, the two theories behave identically, but the separation of timescales required for the self-organization mechanism to be effective does not seem to be biologically plausible. We discuss the key differences between self-organization mechanisms with or without conservation and separated timescales, and in particular, we scrutinize the implications of our findings in neuroscience, hopefully shedding new light into the problem of scale invariance in cortical dynamics.
Comments: 5 figures
Subjects: Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech); Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems (nlin.AO); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.05382 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
  (or arXiv:1911.05382v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] for this version)

Submission history

From: Victor Buendia [view email]
[v1] Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:18:32 GMT (391kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.