We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.OT

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Other Statistics

Title: Sharp hypotheses and bispatial inference

Abstract: A fundamental class of inferential problems are those characterised by there having been a substantial degree of pre-data (or prior) belief that the value of a model parameter was equal or lay close to a specified value, which may, for example, be the value that indicates the absence of an effect. Standard ways of tackling problems of this type, including the Bayesian method, are often highly inadequate in practice. To address this issue, an inferential framework called bispatial inference is put forward, which can be viewed as both a generalisation and radical reinterpretation of existing approaches to inference that are based on P values. It is shown that to obtain an appropriate post-data density function for a given parameter, it is often convenient to combine a special type of bispatial inference, which is constructed around one-sided P values, with a previously outlined form of fiducial inference. Finally, by using what are called post-data opinion curves, this bispatial-fiducial theory is naturally extended to deal with the general scenario in which any number of parameters may be unknown. The application of the theory is illustrated in various examples, which are especially relevant to the analysis of clinical trial data.
Comments: Corrected, rewritten and extended. *Final version*
Subjects: Other Statistics (stat.OT); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.09049 [stat.OT]
  (or arXiv:1911.09049v2 [stat.OT] for this version)

Submission history

From: Russell Bowater [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:24:29 GMT (176kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:28:26 GMT (187kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.