We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Condensed Matter > Materials Science

Title: Thermal Conductivity of Oxide Tunnel Barriers in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions Measured by Ultrafast Thermoreflectance and Magneto-optic Kerr Effect Thermometry

Abstract: Spin-dependent charge transport in magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) can be manipulated by a temperature gradient, which can be utilized for spintronic and spin caloritronic applications. Evaluation of the thermally induced phenomena requires knowledge of the temperature differences across the oxide tunnel barrier adjacent to the ferromagnetic (FM) leads. However, it is challenging to accurately measure thermal properties of an oxide tunnel barrier consisting of only a few atomic layers. In this work, we experimentally interrogate the temperature evolutions in Ru/oxide/FM/seed/MgO (oxide=MgO, MgAl2O4; FM=Co, CoFeB; seed=Pt, Ta) structures having perpendicular magnetic anisotropy using ultrafast thermometry. The Ru layer is optically thick and heated by ultrafast laser pulses; the subsequent temperature changes are monitored using thermoreflectance of Ru and magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) of the FM layers. We independently measure the response times of Co and CoFeB magnetism using quadratic MOKE and obtain {\tau}em=0.2 ps for Co and 2 ps for CoFeB. These time scales are much shorter than the time scale of heat transport through the oxide tunnel barrier, which occurs at 10-3000 ps. We determine effective thermal conductivities of MgO and MgAl2O4 tunnel barriers in the range of 0.4-0.6 W m-1 K-1, comparable to an estimate of the series conductance of the Ru/oxide and oxide/FM interfaces and an order of magnitude smaller than the thermal conductivity of MgO thin films. We find that the electron-phonon thermal conductance near the tunnel barrier is only a factor of 5-12 larger than the thermal conductance of the oxide tunnel barrier. Therefore, the drop in the electronic temperature is approximately 20-30% larger than the drop in the phonon temperature across the tunnel barrier.
Comments: 31 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 024007 (2020)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.024007
Cite as: arXiv:1912.03588 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
  (or arXiv:1912.03588v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)

Submission history

From: Hyejin Jang [view email]
[v1] Sun, 8 Dec 2019 01:25:28 GMT (379kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.