Current browse context:
cond-mat.supr-con
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Condensed Matter > Superconductivity
Title: Fundamental difference in the electronic reconstruction of infinite-layer vs. perovskite neodymium nickelate films on SrTiO$_3$(001)
(Submitted on 11 Jan 2020 (this version), latest version 7 Apr 2020 (v2))
Abstract: Motivated by the recent reports of superconductivity in Sr-doped NdNiO$_2$ films on SrTiO$_3$(001) [Li et al., Nature (London) 572, 624 (2019)], we explore the role of the polar interface on the structural and electronic properties of NdNiO$_n$/SrTiO$_3$(001) ($n=2,3$) by performing first-principles calculations including a Coulomb repulsion term. For infinite-layer nickelate films ($n=2$), electronic reconstruction drives the emergence of a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) at the interface involving a strong occupation of the Ti $3d$ states. This effect is more pronounced than in the paradigmatic LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$(001) system and accompanied by a substantial reconstruction of the Fermi surface as well as strong ionic relaxations and Ni valence modulations. The Ni $e_g$ orbital polarization increases throughout the film and exceeds $35\%$ at the surface. In contrast, no 2DEG forms for films in the perovskite structure ($n=3$) or if a single perovskite layer persists at the interface, and the polarity mismatch is exclusively accommodated by electrostatic doping of the nickelate, accompanied by ionic relaxations. We analyze the topotactic reaction from the perovskite to the infinite-layer phase and show why the reduction is confined to the nickelate film, whereas the SrTiO$_3$ substrate remains intact.
Submission history
From: Benjamin Geisler [view email][v1] Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:48:57 GMT (4447kb,D)
[v2] Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:27:31 GMT (4548kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.